Skip to main content

West Plains Subarea Transportation Management Plan – Targeted Outcomes & Goals

Identify Needs

The following were identified as possible factors contributing to the current conditions in and around the US 2 corridor: 

  • A lack of local, street network, which contributes to more travelers on US 2. 
  • A lack of multi-modal (transit, bicycles, and pedestrians) transportation options, which can increase travel times and the dependency on vehicle trips.
  • Census data indicates that 95% of people who work in the West Plains area live outside the area – see 2015 where people live and work
  • Increasing growth and development in West Plains is a regional priority.

Study Objectives

The following are some of the planned improvements that were identified for the study area:

  • Safety – evaluate and identify strategies to improve the safety performance for all modes of travel, such as adding strategic left-turn restrictions along the US 2 corridor.
  • Mobility – evaluate and identify strategies to improve the mobility for all modes of travel, such as developing a supporting local roadway network, increasing transit service, improving the ability to walk and bike in and around the US 2 corridor. These strategies may include Transportation Systems Management & Operations (TSMO) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies. See WSDOT TSMO Page
  • Quality of Life – evaluate and identify strategies to enhance the quality of life in the West Plains subarea.
  • Economic Vitality – evaluate and identify strategies to enhance economic vitality on the West Plains subarea. 

Targeted Outcomes

  • Develop a plan with prioritized programming with an associated funding mechanism to address the transportation needs associated with projected land use growth.
  • Based on past study efforts and analysis accomplished in this study, investigate and identify parallel corridors including the 6th/12th corridor and the 18th/21st corridor. Determine the local alignments and connections to the transportation system.
  • Identify achievable “practical solutions” system improvements, including on and off the state network prioritization, future programming and implementation.
  • Select strategies that result in predictability and reliability in travel time, emergency service response times and Fairchild Air Force Base response time.
  • Identify potential right of way needs.
  • Analyze the impacts of land use development in the West Plains to US 2 and the regional network.
  • Review and align relevant outcomes identified in previous studies & plans in the West Plains Study area.

Previews West Plains Studies and Plans:

  • 2006 – City of Airway Heights Highway 2 Revitalization
  • 2009 – City of Spokane Master Bike Plan
  • 2010 – WA Airport & Compatible Land Use Guidebook
  • 2010 – WSDOT US 2 Route Development Plan, Lincoln Co. Line to I-90 MP 266.86 to MP 283.01
  • 2011 – SRTC West Plains-SIA Transportation Study
  • 2011 – TIA Spokane Tribe West Plains Development
  • 2012 – Spokane County Comprehensive Plan
  • 2012 – Spokane AIR – West Site Transportation Analysis, City of Spokane
  • 2013 – Land Development Risks along State Transportation Corridor, WSDOT
  • 2013 – VE Study I-90/SR 902 I/C Improvements, Value Management Strategies
  • 2014 – City of Spokane West Plains Subarea Transportation Plan
  • 2014 – Spokane International Airport Master Plan
  • 2015 – Rowand Business Park, Morrison Maierle, Inc.
  • 2016 – City of Spokane Comprehensive Plan update 2017
  • 2016 – City of Spokane Comprehensive Plan 2017 Appendix D
  • 2017 – City of Airway Heights Transportation circular Plan
  • 2017 – City of Airway Heights US 2 Plan Model Zoning Overlay
  • 2018 – WSDOT Corridor Sketch Initiative, US 2: Craig Rd to Russell Rd, MP 277.2 to MP 281.5
  • 2018 – Project Rose Traffic Impact Analysis
Targeted outcomes and goals